Scott+Walker+Admits+Union-Busting+Provision+Doesn't+Save+Any+Money

= **Scott Walker Admits Union-Busting Provision "Doesn't Save Any" Money for the State of Wisconsin** = = = = = = by: Zaid Jilani, Think Progress = = Published on //Truthout// ( http://www.truthout.org ) = = Tuesday 19 April 2011 =

= Today, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform called Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) and Peter Shumlin (D-VT) to testify in a hearing titled "State and Municipal Debt: Tough Choices Ahead." Much of the hearing was spent probing Wisconsin's spate of anti-union restrictions it recently passed. = = At one point, Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) confronted Walker about his crackdown on public employee unions. The congressman referenced a provision Walker signed into law that would require union members to vote every year to continue their membership. Kucinich asked the governor how much money the state would save from the provision. Walker repeatedly dodged the question and eventually admitted that it actually wouldn't save anything at all. = = Kucinich then asked Walker how much money would be saved by barring union dues from being drawn from employee paychecks, another provision of Walker's legislation. Walker claimed that it would save workers money, but was unable to explain how it would save the state any money. Kucinich then produced a document from the Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the state's equivalent of the Congressional Budget Office, that concluded that Walker's measures were "nonfiscal" — meaning they had no impact on the state's finances. = = Kucinich asked that the letter be included in the public record, but Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) refused: = = KUCINICH: Let me ask you about some of the specific provisions in your proposals to strip collective bargaining rights. First, your proposal would require unions to hold annual votes to continue representing their own members. Can you please explain to me and members of this committee how much money this provision saves for your state budget? = = WALKER: That and a number of other provisions we put in because if you're going to ask, if you're going to put in place a change like that, we wanted to make sure we protected the workers of our state, so they got value out of that. [...] = = KUCINICH: Would you answer the question? How much money does it save, Governor? = = WALKER: It doesn't save any. [...] = = KUCINICH: I want to ask about another one of your proposals. Under your plan you would prohibit paying union member dues from their paychecks. How much money would this provision save your state budget? = = WALKER: It would save employees a thousand dollars a year they could use to pay for their pensions and health care contributions. = = KUCINICH: Governor, it wouldn't save anything. [Goes on to present letter from LRF and is denied unanimous request for it to be placed in the public record by Issa] = = Walker's admission is crucial because he had long claimed that his anti-union "budget repair bill" was designed to save the state money [5], not bust unions. But his words today =

= = = = =News= =home=